Mr. Dawkins, who can’t afford a lawyer and is representing himself, plans to counter that Michigan law contains a provision stating that the court must consider “any legal and moral obligation” that the defendant has to support children or a spouse.
In a telephone interview from Lakeland Correctional Facility in Coldwater, Mich., Mr. Dawkins said his family is being unfairly punished. “It hurts my kids,” he said. “I did wrong, but those kids are completely innocent.”
In the acknowledgments in his book, Mr. Dawkins described the guilt and sadness he has lived with after the murder, and referred to his writing as “a lifeboat.” But his literary success was clouded by his dark past, and some questioned whether he deserved a book deal. In an interview with The New York Times for an article about Mr. Dawkins, Kenneth Bowman, the brother of the victim, said he thought Mr. Dawkins shouldn’t be able to write and publish from prison, and that any money he receives should go to the victim’s family or a charity.
Within a few months of The Times article, a headline in The Detroit News asked whether Mr. Dawkins should be allowed to profit from tragedy. Not long after that story appeared, Mr. Dawkins received the court summons, demanding partial “reimbursement to the state for Defendant’s cost of care while incarcerated.”
Michigan is one of more than 40 states where prisoners can be forced to pay for the cost of their incarceration, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law. Laws that allow the government to charge prisoners “room and board” or “cost of care” fees have proliferated in recent decades, as states charge inmates and parolees for everything from medical care, clothing and meals to police transport, public defense fees, drug testing and electronic monitoring.
Since so many prisoners are impoverished to begin with, states typically don’t raise much money by charging inmates room and board fees, and in some states, the enforcement of these laws is conditional on the prisoner’s ability to pay. But as the cost of mass incarceration has soared, with more than 2.2 million adults in prisons and jails across the United States, some states have grown more aggressive in seeking money from prisoners and formerly incarcerated people.
During the last fiscal year, Michigan collected some $3.7 million from 294 prisoners, who account for just a fraction of the state’s nearly 40,000 inmates. Around the country, some 10 million people owe $50 billion in fees stemming from their arrest or imprisonment, according to a 2015 Brennan Center report.
AdvertisementContinue reading the main story
States often take a percentage of the earnings inmates receive through prison work programs. But some states have also sought money from prisoners who have received larger sums, through an inheritance or legal settlements or, as in Mr. Dawkins’s case, money they acquire through their own initiative. After an Illinois inmate who was serving a 15-month sentence for a drug conviction received a $31,690 settlement for his mother’s death, he was forced to pay the state nearly $20,000 for the cost of his imprisonment, leaving him nearly destitute when he was paroled in 2015.
In Florida, a convict named Jeremy Barrett who received a $150,000 settlement from the Department of Corrections for negligence, after he was attacked in 2011 by another inmate who gouged out his eye, was forced to pay the state nearly $55,000 from the settlement as reimbursement for his three years in prison.
When prisoners and former inmates fight such charges, courts often rule in the state’s favor. In 2000, Connecticut’s Supreme Court ruled that Eric Ham, who was serving a 50-year sentence for murder, had to pay nearly $900,000 toward the cost of his incarceration, after he won a settlement of around $1 million from the city of New Haven for falsely arresting him for another crime that he didn’t commit.
Proponents of such laws argue that convicted criminals should pay for their own imprisonment when they have the financial means to do so. But some prisoners’s rights advocates say saddling inmates and parolees with fees can hinder their rehabilitation by making it harder for them to support themselves and their families, and could violate the Eighth Amendment, which bars cruel and unusual punishment and excessive fines.
Newsletter Sign UpContinue reading the main story
Thank you for subscribing.
An error has occurred. Please try again later.
You are already subscribed to this email.
“To say, you’re not only going to be deprived of your liberty, you’re then going to have to pay for the separation from society, that raises cruel and unusual punishment issues,” said Lauren-Brooke Eisen, senior counsel in the Brennan Center’s justice program.
Other legal experts said that states should encourage prisoners like Mr. Dawkins, who has used his time in prison to do something he finds meaningful, rather than punish them.
“He’s put his talents to productive use in a way that’s making the world a better place,” Sharon Dolovich, a law professor and the director of the prison law and policy program at U.C.L.A.’s School of Law. “It’s something that we as a society should be 100 percent supportive of.”
Mr. Dawkins started writing fiction in college, as an English major at Southern Illinois University. He later enrolled in a graduate writing program at Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo, where he met his partner, Kimberly Knutsen. They moved in together and he became a father to her 3-year-old son. They later had two more children, a son and a daughter.
But Mr. Dawkins, who has struggled with addiction and alcoholism since he was 12, slipped back into drug use, and took ketamine and heroin. One October night in 2004, he dressed up in a gangster costume, smoked crack and went on a rampage in Kalamazoo that culminated in a standoff with a six-member SWAT team. After terrorizing some party goers, he shot and killed Thomas Bowman and took Mr. Bowman’s roommate hostage. He confessed and was sentenced to life in prison without parole.
AdvertisementContinue reading the main story
After his arrest, he felt suicidal. Then, after about a year, he started writing fiction, which took his mind off his surroundings. His parents, Warren and Arllis Dawkins, sent him a typewriter, and he typed his stories and mailed them to his sister, who submitted them to small journals. Many of his stories unfold in jails or prisons, and some draw on his own experiences, while others are surreal and fantastical. Jarrett Haley, the founder of a small literary magazine, Bull, which published Mr. Dawkins, helped him assemble and edit a story collection and get a literary agent. His agent, Sandra Dijkstra, sold the collection to Scribner in 2016, and Mr. Dawkins split his portion of the advance with Mr. Haley, who was instrumental in getting him a book deal.
He had his literary agent send the remainder of the money, a little over $50,000, to a limited liability corporation set up by his parents. Ms. Knutsen, who teaches English at Concordia University in Portland, Ore., said the funds have been used to pay for college and high school tuition, text books, car payments and dental care for their children: Henry, 23; Elijah, 19; and Lily Rose, 17.
After the lawsuit against him was filed, Mr. Dawkins’s agent suspended all payments from the publisher, on the state’s orders. (Mr. Dawkins was due to receive the final payment from his advance when the paperback edition of “The Graybar Hotel” comes out this spring.)
The state also froze his prison account, leaving him with a stipend of $25 a month. Previously, his family had been sending about $200 to $300 a month to his account, which he uses to pay for phone calls, emails and snacks and to buy paper for his typewriter.
The attorney general’s office declined to answer questions about Mr. Dawkin’s case, and a press secretary said the office “cannot comment on pending litigation.”
Prisoners who publish their writing are legally protected under the First Amendment. But some states have tried to limit inmates’s ability to publish and get paid for their work. Malcolm Braly, one of the most famous fiction writers to emerge from prison, delayed publishing his 1967 novel, “On the Yard,” until he was off parole, because officials from the department of corrections said publishing the novel would violate the terms of his parole.
In many states, prisoners have also been barred from receiving money for writing nonfiction accounts of their crimes, and money made from such books or film deals gets directed into a fund for victims or their families.
H. Bruce Franklin, author of “Prison Literature in America,” said that if prisoners who publish books are forced to forfeit their advances and royalties to the state, it could dissuade aspiring writers who are incarcerated from seeking to publish at all.
“It’s a tremendous discouragement to all the prisoners trying to write, to have a meaningful life when they are in prison,” he said.
AdvertisementContinue reading the main story
Mr. Dawkins plans to keep writing. He’s currently working on a dystopian novel, set in a huge underground prison in Coldwater, Mich., where inmates are put into a state of hibernation. He’s more than halfway done with it, and hopes to publish it one day.